![]() |
IAD vs. Multi-Cavity Interference Filters Awareness Technology uses Ion Assisted Deposition (IAD) filters which are more expensive, but will give superior performance far longer than multi-cavity filters, resulting in reduced service costs and down-time for filter replacement. Awareness
Technology specializes in optical design, and has always considered filter quality to be
of major importance in achieving photometric accuracy and, therefore, reliable test
results. Because of this consideration, Awareness Technology chooses only Ion Assisted
Deposition (IAD) filters when manufacturing Stat Fax and ChemWell instruments. IAD
filters are also referred to as hard coat filters. What is IAD? Prior to the 1990's, narrow-band interference filters were subject to instability and deterioration due to humidity, aging, and temperature changes, resulting in low peak transmittance and out-of-band transmittance ("leakage"). Filters manufactured using IAD technology and processes are vastly superior to sealed soft-coated interference filters especially in terms of stability and longevity. IAD is an advanced coating process that yields significant
reduction in film porosity in an effort to solve the stability problems inherent to
soft coated filters. The principal function of IAD is to bombard the coating material with
accelerated ions to densify the coating. Testing Both types of filters were tested
in an environmental test chamber (temperature and humidity) that was designed to simulate
MIL-STD-810C for the purpose of testing the environmental integrity of the filters. Each
day in the test chamber corresponds to approximately 1 year of operation in extreme (high)
temperature and humidity. Filters were tested for 7 days and checked for
delamination, visible deterioration and %T changes periodically, with a final inspection
and assessment on day 7. The multi-cavity filters exhibited
incipient delamination sometimes as early as the third day in the test chamber, and most
failed at the end of 7 days, either by delamination or >10% increase in %T. View Multi-cavity filter - clouded after 3 day test View Multi-cavity filter - delaminated after 7 day test Over the course of 3 years, we
continued environmental testing of filters from every production lot. A sample filter was
randomly selected and placed in the test chamber. With very few exceptions, the IAD
filters passed the tests of their physical integrity, %T and exhibited no significant peak
shift. View IAD filter - after 7 day test In
another test, a set of filters (340, 405, 450, 492, 545, 600 - IAD type) were placed
outdoors and exposed to direct sunlight, rain and temperature extremes typical of South
Florida. After 2 years, the filters had no significant change in physical integrity, %T or
peak shift. Because we use these higher quality, longer lasting, more expensive filters, we may not always compete on price alone with companies selling cheap instruments with low quality filters. When a competitor's instruments are brand new, their filters may give adequate results, but as the filters deteriorate, results can become unsatisfactory. It is important that customers realize the long-term value and the advantages of IAD filters over the multi-cavity type. The small additional cost of IAD technology filters is negligible when compared to the advantages in added dependability and overall performance of the instrument over many years. |
040130
Copyright 2004 Awareness Technology, Inc. USA. All rights reserved.